accountable AI for marketing and commerce
Every platform gave you an AI that acts. Jurnies gives you an AI that answers for the result.
Joe drafts. You ratify. Joe answers for it. Everything below that claims a capability names the record it came from — and where that record does not yet say the capability is live, the claim is not on this page.
the shape of the thing
One plan. One brain. One customer record. One truth.
Joe drafts.
Joe proposes the plan from the data the platform already holds, rather than asking you to assemble it from ten dashboards that disagree.
You ratify.
The plan is a typed, compiled, decision-binding artefact. You edit it and you ratify it. You stay the strategist; the ratification is the moment authority transfers, and it is yours.
Joe answers for it.
Every action carries a binding back to an objective in that plan and an audit trail. An agent that acts is not accountable. An employee that reports against a plan is.
And this page is a tenant of it.
jurnies.com renders through the same block registry and the same renderer a customer's page uses. Open the source: every section on this page carries the block id it was composed from.
the evidence, not the headline
What is live today — and what is not
Joe answers customers in production today.
The platform's own capability census records Joe as the one capability of twelve that is live — for one tenant, on one channel, on a named model that is not Claude. The same entry records the three findings that qualify it, including two scheduled jobs that fail every time they run. We publish the qualification with the claim.
capability:11-joe ·
An operator's session is bound to exactly one tenant, and that is re-proven every night.
A scripted operator signs in through the real login — no minted token — and lands in the Hub; a second assertion checks the tenant it landed in is the internal probe tenant and not a paying customer's. Both passed on the nightly run of 2026-09-14.
walkthrough:2026-09-14#operator-tenant-binding ·
When the platform refuses you, it says so — and it does not dress a fault up as a refusal.
Six operator surfaces assert that a permission refusal is drawn as a permission problem, each one paired with a negative control asserting that a server fault is not. All twelve assertions passed on 2026-09-14. A gate with no failing control is not a gate.
walkthrough:2026-09-14#refusal-is-drawn-as-refusal ·
Most of this platform is not finished, and we do not claim it here.
Every capability this page does not mention is a capability our own census does not yet record as live. That census is the reason the page is this short. We would rather be short than be believed and then found out.
Start with the demo, not the deck.
We will show you the parts that work and the parts that do not, on the real system, in the same half hour.
It goes to a person's inbox. There is no form, and no trial clock.